Future windows operating system

Does it look clean and modern? Can you customise the UI to better suit your tastes? Multiple methods of interaction. Does it offer multiple ways of interacting with it? From voice, touch, traditional keyboard and mouse interactions? How easy is it to accomplish what you need within the UI with either a keyboard or mouse? Provide useful help.

Does it provide any documentation on how to do things? Intuitive Navigation. How hard is the operating system to navigate? Does it make things needlessly complicated? Does it hide options under 6 different menus? Is it intuitive? For example plug and play. On June 24 Microsoft is hosting a big event where it will unveil the future of its Windows operating system.

There have been a number of suggestions, including Windows , WindowsOS or simply "Windows", but so far most of the clues have been pointing to it being Windows In one way this name makes a lot of sense -- it helps Microsoft move away from some of the negativity that surrounds Windows 10 and also sells the fact that this is a BIG change. However, Microsoft has in the past said that Windows 10 will be the "last" version of Windows. While the company is perfectly within its rights to change its mind and bring out Windows 11, another clue has surfaced which suggests that Microsoft might be planning to adopt a macOS-style naming convention with future versions of its software.

An addition recently found in some Microsoft metadata and later removed suggests the codename being given to the future Windows update -- Sun Valley -- could well end up being the actual name of the product. Undoubtedly, it can bring a world of benefits for developers and users, especially as we move into the next decade where technology and computing are likely to see big leaps. This definitely indicates that Windows Core OS is an operating system for the future. But will it see the light of the day, considering that Microsoft is shelving many of its much-talked-about products?

Also, the exit of Windows chief Terry Myerson last year put a big question on the future of this operating system. Lavanya Rathnam is a professional writer of tech and financial blogs. Creative thinker, out of the boxer, content builder and tenacious researcher who specializes in explaining complex ideas to different audiences. I will go out of business if I can't install Micrografx Draw 6. It's the heart of my entire gig. It will not work on Windows 10 64 bit, even if it's on a 32 bit virtual machine.

So, I would welcome an OS that can do this Thank You Definitely need the legacy support Why would you include legacy hardware and support in an OS that longer utilizes those type of architectures? Simply answered, you don't else we would still be horse and buggy and trying to use a sling-shot to send a man to the moon. So in order for me to get this new operating system to keep up with new tech what is the specs my two desktop computers and laptop needs to stay ahead?

Your email address will not be published. I have time for one screen in my life. I need to be able to tune in one single information structure and know that my whole digital life -- every document, every file type -- is in there.

And I need to be able to tune in this structure from any Net-connected device anywhere. But operating systems have been traveling in the exact opposite direction, away from unity and simplicity. Today, most users' documents are distributed over many computers often three "main" ones: at home, at work and a laptop. Inside each computer, documents are scattered as if someone had dumped them out of a low-flying airplane: some in the file hierarchy or on the desktop; mail in the mailer; bookmarks in the browser; images, other multimedia types, calendar and address information in other boxes.

If you own a PDA, Internet-enabled cell phone or other digital gadgets, you have even more boxes to lose things in. This is not merely unacceptable, it's crazy. No one can work effectively in such an environment. Today's information environment is, in this sense, a huge step backward from the world of, say, In , you could say "Pull the Schwartz file," and the whole Schwartz dossier would be there -- letters, memos, reports, photos, jottings, resumes, publications, bills, contracts and receipts -- the whole story.

Current operating systems have traditionally been built bottom-up: Start with the machine, then connect it somehow to the user. Their goal is to package the processor, memory, disk and other peripherals which are unmitigated nuisances to manipulate directly , so that you can manage them by remote control. Instead of moving bits around the disk, you drag file icons around the desktop. The next-generation operating system starts with the user.

It ignores the underlying hardware -- and as a result, such systems are inherently less efficient than today's primitive, machine-centered ones. Instead, it reflects the shape of your life.

Its role is to track your life event by event, moment by moment, thought by thought.